Job Anbalagan
Job Anbalagan's blog
 533stars  |   36readers
View profile|View all posts| Follow this blog
Why I Repented Of A Marriage That God Called Adulterous! - Cheryl
||December 05, 2007|1140 reads
 

To add a comment to "Why I Repented Of A Marriage That God Called Adulterous! - Cheryl"
Travis Evans
December 05, 2007
May Grace abound!
Cindy
December 05, 2007
To be honest, I do not know why some will say "we are not under the law" in regards to remarital adultery during this New Covenant period, yet they go back to the OT to justify remarital adultery that Jesus spoke against in the NT........

Are not Jesus' words enough for us in this matter?   If He does not recognize a "marriage" as valid, but instead calls it adultery, why do we say differently?    Jesus said that those who forsake their original marriages (lawful marriages in His sight) and marry others are committing adultery.  It matters not that man and man's laws have legalized what Jesus calls adultery, just as it matters not that man and man's laws have legalized homosexuality and made valid in many places homosexual marriage.   Jesus in addressing His laws said,

"15And He said to them, "You are those who justify yourselves in the sight of men, butGod knows your hearts; for that which is highly esteemed among men is detestable in the sight of God.

 16"(The Law and the Prophets were proclaimed until John; since that time the gospel of the kingdom of God has been preached, and everyone is forcing his way into it.

 17"But it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for one stroke of a letter of the Law to fail.

 18"Everyone who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries one who is divorced from a husband commits adultery. "

Hear the Words of the Lord-----please seek His face............and do not follow man, because man will not be standing by your side on judgment day.   We will all stand before the Lord and answer for those things done in the flesh...........

Cindy
December 05, 2007
<<<<<<<<The law of my heart tells me if she cheats and I can't forgive her, that to put her away is ok. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Mt. 18:32"Then summoning him, his lord said to him, 'You wicked slave, I forgave you all that debt because you pleaded with me.

 33'Should you not also have had mercy on your fellow slave, in the same way that I had mercy on you?'

 34"And his lord, moved with anger, handed him over to the torturers until he should repay all that was owed him.

 35"My heavenly Father will also do the same to you, if each of you does not forgive his brother from your heart."

Job Anbalagan
December 05, 2007
It is a testimony of a woman of God which is based on the words of Jesus Christ.

I respond to the following post of articmonster:

"Now then -- the law of my heart tells me to take one wife. the law of my heart tells me to stay with my wife. the law of my heart says that if she leaves me, it is ok for me to take another. The law of my heart tells me if she cheats and I can't forgive her, that to put her away is ok. The law of my heart says its ok to leave a physically abusive spouse and marry another...."

It seems according to the above comments that the law of the heart can allow us to do anything which may appear to be lawful in our sight.  The Word of God says that the human heart is the most wicked thing which is subject to deception. What should justify our action is not our deceitful hearts but the word of God.

Hagar was not divorced at all.  Sarah sent her away from the house.  Since Hagar was not married to Abraham, the question of divorce does not arise.  Hagar was given to Abraham by Sarah not through a marriage covenant.  Sarah gave Hagar to Abraham to beget children. No doubt, Jacob had many wives because the system of polygamy was allowed of God.  But Jacob did not have someone's wife.  Let us note that during the period of Abraham, the Law of Moses was not given at all.  Moses gave the option of divorce only to the men of Israel during the Mosaic law dispensation. 

A dead covenant cannot be replaced by grace at all. Grace has nothing to do with a covenant. A covenant is made between two or more parties.  The marriage covenant comes to an end only through the death of a spouse and not through the human act of divorce which is not allowed by God under the New Covenant.  Grace does not give us license to commit the sin of adultery. Can anyone explain who or what makes the marriage covenant a dead thing? 
DeboraJ
December 05, 2007
I just have to say that I disagree with the divorce aspect of her situation.  While I agree repenting of the marriage before God is important, she made a lifelong commitment too.  She gave her word and "let your yes be yes."  A marriage can be redeemed and made into something new.  If God can make clean the human spirit of adultry, then He can make clean a marriage of it as well. But repenting means turning from, so they must turn from the mindset that divorce is ok.  God hates divorce I find it hard to believe that He would ask her to do something He hates. 
Job Anbalagan
December 05, 2007
Deborah J, Sister Cheryl has done the right thing in obedience to the Word of God.  An unscriptural marriage or an adulterous relationship should be repented, dissolved and given up. How can a re-marriage after divorce be clean when Jesus calls this relationship the sin of adultery. Cheryl had rightly resorted to the legal course of divorce because her second marriage was performed in a legal manner in the eyes of the law of the land. On restoration, she pleased God by sacrificing her love for her "unlawful" husband. She had denied herself, taken up the cross and followed her Lord in obedience to His words.  It is not some mind-set but obedience to His words. A marriage can be redeemed but an adulterous relation has to be repented and given up.

Job Anbalagan
DeboraJ
December 05, 2007

I disagree.  From what I read this was her first marriage, not her second.  But it was her husband's 3rd.  And Jesus hates divorce.  This reads as a case of being crushed by the law not being redeemed.  Legalism is dangerous and destructive.  All have fallen short, all have sinned all need to repent.  One can make oneself "do" the acts of the law but if one is not changed from the inside you are no different then a Pharisee.  Redemption is being transformed into something new and different, her marriage could have been redeemed.  You said so yourself a marriage can be redeemed, it wasn't just a relationship it was a marriage. 
I find the hardest part of Christianity is not in the doing but in the transformation.  I can make myself act in accordance to the law but I can not make myself live the truth in my spirit.  

Job Anbalagan
December 05, 2007
Cheryl married a divorced man with his spouses living.  Then she divorced him and forsook that unscriptural and adulterous relationship. Her divorce is tantamount to dissolution of her unscriptural marriage with a divorced man.  How could her adulterous marriage be redeemed through the Blood of the Lamb?  It was not a marriage in the sight of God, in view of the words of Jesus Christ.  It is not the Law of Moses.  Jesus gave us His words under the Covenant of grace only.  Only the Law of Moses justified the divorce by the men of Israel under the Old Covenant, due to the hardness of their hearts as they wanted to divorce their wives on the ground of uncleanness.

For the saints of God under the New Covenant, there is neither divorce nor remarriage permissible. Be holy as your God is holy. A marriage is for life.  Only the death, and not a legal ends a marriage covenant.

Please take time to read our messages at http://gloryofhiscross.googlepages.com/marriageanddivorce
DeboraJ
December 05, 2007
Then how do you explain this?  This is new covenant teaching

 8Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I am. 9But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.

 10To the married I give this command (not I, but the Lord): A wife must not separate from her husband. 11But if she does, she must remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband. And a husband must not divorce his wife.

 12To the rest I say this (I, not the Lord): If any brother has a wife who is not a believer and she is willing to live with him, he must not divorce her. 13And if a woman has a husband who is not a believer and he is willing to live with her, she must not divorce him. 14For the unbelieving husband has been sanctified through his wife, and the unbelieving wife has been sanctified through her believing husband. Otherwise your children would be unclean, but as it is, they are holy.

 15But if the unbeliever leaves, let him do so. A believing man or woman is not bound in such circumstances; God has called us to live in peace. 16How do you know, wife, whether you will save your husband? Or, how do you know, husband, whether you will save your wife?

DeboraJ
December 05, 2007

1 Corinthians 7:8-16

DeboraJ
December 05, 2007
Oh and one more comment,

 4Now when a man works, his wages are not credited to him as a gift, but as an obligation. 5However, to the man who does not work but trusts God who justifies the wicked, his faith is credited as righteousness. 6David says the same thing when he speaks of the blessedness of the man to whom God credits righteousness apart from works:
 7"Blessed are they
      whose transgressions are forgiven,
      whose sins are covered.
 8Blessed is the man
      whose sin the Lord will never count against him."[b]
Romans 4:4-8
Cindy
December 05, 2007
Hello Debora,

Do you believe Lk. 16:15-18 pertains to the New Covenant Christian?

As for I Cor. 7;10-12, Paul is dealing with lawful marriages in the sight of God and Jesus' commands in regards to them.   A husband is NOT to divorce his wife.  If a woman does depart, she is to remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband.  Why?  Because, according to Paul's teachings in Rom. 7:2-3, I Cor. 7:39, a woman is bound to her husband in the eyes of the Lord until death.  Paul even uses the example of an adulterous woman in Rom. 7:2-3 and still insists that it is death which separates what God has joined together.

Regarding I Cor. 7:15, if you do a study on the phrase "not under bondage" you will find that it is not the same greek word used in Rom. 7:2-3 in relation to the marriage bond.   In I Cor. 7:15 the word "bondage" has to do with servitude.   In such cases where a husband departs, the remaining one is not obliged to serve/chase after/try to force to reconcile, etc.   Why?  Because the "unbeliever" does not abide in Christ, therefore would not be welcoming to do what is "right" in His sight in regards to preserving the marriage relationship.

If we study the intended meaning of I Cor. 7:10-11, we see that Paul uses the word "unmarried" to the wife to departs.   What does that mean?  Does it mean that she is no longer bound to her husband in the eyes of the Lord?   No, it does not mean that, else she would be permitted to join with another man---she is not permitted that, however.   Her only two choices as a follower of Christ is to stay single or to be reconciled with her spouse.   How many today in the "church" do you see following this command of the Lord?  Very few, sadly.     This is why we see so many broken families and terrible problems in the step families.  Many do not want to "wait" for an erring spouse to repent.  Instead, they are disobeying the Lord (many times in ignorance because the Word of God is not taught/practiced in their churches), and entering into adultery with another-----possibly even another brother/sister's spouse.   The Lord speaks very harshly to those who defraud their brothers and sisters.   As I said, many do not do this maliciously, but out of ignorance marry divorced persons who do not belong to them, but belong to the ONE God joined them to.

Most of us would like for the Word to say otherwise..........to say that God blessed THIS marriage one is in(no matter what #marriage it is), but the truth is, the Word does not support that any more than the Word supports homosexual marriages.   If God has spoken that someone is not free to marry another, man does not have the power to usurp God and His commands for the use of marriage and in regards to which marriages He views as valid marriages..........Please seek the Lord in His Word on this, debora...................
DeboraJ
December 05, 2007

Yes I do believe Lk pertains to the New Covenant Church, but Job said that there is no divorce under the New Covenant.  Which is untrue.

The point I was making is that it is for freedom that we have been set free.  There is no condemnation in Christ Jesus.  In faith you can ask anything in His name.  You ask for redemption, then it will come.  Can all things be made new?  Yes they can. 

I am sorry but you will not convince me that Jesus told this woman to commit another sin in order to correct the first one.  Basically she acted upon the law and not love. 

Cindy
December 05, 2007

Hello Arctic,
 
You said: <<<<<I do believe it was not the intention of the New covenant to bring about a stricter standards of laws than the levitical covenant>>>>>

I have to ask you then, what do you believe Jesus' disciples believed about what He was teaching them concerning marriage?  (Mt. 19:10) 

As for polygamy, Jesus wasn't just dealing with the "leaders" in regards to marital practices.   He brought marriage BACK to the creation intent for marriage----one man/one woman for life (Rom. 7:2-3, I Cor. 7:39).
Cindy
December 05, 2007
Debora,

If Luke 16:15-18 pertains to the NT church, then what Jesus is doing is prohibiting divorce and remarriage.  He is stating that when one forsakes their marriage and enter into another marriage, they are committing adultery.  Just because man's law legalize this adultery, making it commonplace, does not mean that God honors the sin.

As for the woman committing another sin because she forsook the adultery she was in (by joining herself to another woman's husband), I do not believe the Word of God is on your side in this.   If the Lord has labelled a relationship sin, unless the Word of God shows that it is no longer sin, then it is still sin and if one is a true believer, they will want to forsake that sin as it affects their walk/witness/relationship to the Body of Christ as well as the Lord Himself.

We need to remember that all divorce in scripture was not sin.  In Ezra 9-10, the men divorced their wives IN REPENTANCE.   They had disobeyed the Lord and entered into prohibited marriages---and the Lord's judgment fell upon them...........until they put away those wives.

Also, when we read that passage, "I hate divorce(putting away)", it is speaking of the covenant wife...........not a woman/man one enters into an adulterous marriage.   God hates the separation of what HE joined together.   I don't believe scripture teaches that God joins people in adultery.

I believe she did act in "love"...........She loved the Lord more than her life, which is what all true believers are called to.   She came out of adultery, just like others come out of sinful relationships when they are revealed as such.  We must not forget to remember that there are women/men who are standing for the marriages God joined together to be restored.  

It seems whenever this discussion occurs that people want "grace/love" extended towards those whom the Lord has said are in adultery, but I must ask this:   What about those whom the Lord joined together for life and are remaining faithful to the vows they took----before God and man?   They are NOT committing adultery...........they are remaining faithful.   Are they "law" keepers because they believe with all their hearts that whom the Lord gave to them is theirs until one of them passes from this life?
DeboraJ
December 05, 2007

I will have to bow out of this conversation.  The Lord has told me that this is only bringing about a fruit of division and dissention.  Please forgive me for my arrogance and not keeping the peace between brothers.  This is not an issue the Lord has brought into my life and it is only arrogance that keeps me argueing the point. 

Job Anbalagan
December 05, 2007
Dear Arctic, I agree that Abraham sent away Hagar but at the instance of his wife, Hagar.
Dear Debora J,  we do learn from one another in the Body of Christ through fellowship by way of teaching.  Even if you disagree, I still love you because of you are of the same Body of Christ, of which I am also a member. 

I am not supposed to add to the words of Jesus Christ on divorce and remarriage.  In Mathew's gospel, the word "except for fornication/adultery" is written, whereas in Mark the same word is not appearing.  The Holy Spirit conveys the words of Jesus Christ to us. Whatever the Holy Spirit hears from Jesus, He conveys the same.  The Holy Spirit does not speak on His own. We cannot ignore the same message given in Mark.  This means that God does not allow divorce even on other grounds than fornication.  He who marries the one divorced even on other grounds commits the sin of adultery.  There is a school of thought that the gospel of Mathew was meant for the Jews and that the gospel of Mark was meant for Gentiles.  However, I do believe that the Holy Spirit wants to convey a definite message that all divorces even on the ground of adultery are not allowed of God.  Today many people can take shelter under Mathew's gospel and justify their divorces saying that their spouses had committed the sin of adultery. If these people want to divorce their spouses on the ground of adultery, they have to prove this charge through the mouth of witnesses not in the court of law but before the elders or before the church.  Are they following this requirement while divorcing their spouses.  They just drag their spouses to the courts of law and present false witnesses against them just to get divorces.  Then they get a decree of divorce through a legal paper and tell us that God has allowed this divorce. 

Let us note the glaring truth that Jesus gave this message to the Pharisees who wanted to divorce their spouses.  If anyone wants to divorce his spouse today, he or she is a Pharisee.  Moses gave this command to the men of Israel due to the hardness of their hearts.  Let us note that under the New Covenant, God has given us a heart of flesh in place of a stony heart given to the Pharisees.  We ought to forgive our sinning spouses and not to divorce them.  If you have been unceremoniously divorced by your spouse, you have to wait on God for restoration of marriage.

Regarding the testimony of Shannon which is on a different footing, I do not want to comment on that. 

NO REMARRIAGE AFTER DIVORCE.
Cindy
December 06, 2007
Debora,

I want to echo brother Job and say that though we differ on this, I too love you in the Lord.   Many think because this issue is so divisive, that those of us on the 'no remarriage' side are unloving, harsh, etc.  So very untrue!!   I think many of us want to share what the Lord has shown us about this very destructive sin in the Body and in the world.

Jesus, when he was asked about His commandments told the hearers that there were only 2.......to Love God with all your heart and to love your neighbor.   We understand that to include the 10 commandments and the "expanded" understanding of sin.  Is it hard to live?  Absolutely.   Will we fall at times?  Yes, because we are in the flesh.  But...........as James said (thanks for reminding of this passage, Arctic. : ) )  we are to be DOERS of the Word, not hearers only----those "works" are evidence of true abiding faith in Jesus.   To be sure, if we take our neighbor's husband/wife, and keep them for ourselves, we are not loving our neighbor, but are hating them.  If we take our neighbor as a partner in adultery, by giving them occasion to sin against the Lord, helping them to NOT come to repentance, we are hating them.  Grace is never spoken of in scripture as a covering to continue in sin, whether the sin is Hate(which is murder to the Lord), adultery, lying, stealing, etc.

The taking of someone who is divorced, or divorcing one's spouse and marrying another is so much more than just "whosoever divorces their spouse and marries another commits adultery, and whosoever marries one divorced, commits adultery".............

There are many facets to this "ongoing adulterous relationship" that people have not yet considered in their justification of remaining in those situations or in the encouraging of others who are in those situations.   We have to be very careful that we are not being used of the enemy to cause our brothers/sisters to retain the ways of the world in the guise of "walking in Grace/love"........real love as spoken by Jame (5:19-20) desires to pull an erring brother/sister out of their sin and save them from a multitude of sins.......  Blessings and love in Him.......
Job Anbalagan
December 06, 2007
I want to add to what my sister Cindy has stated above.  If we open our newspapers, we read a lot about the adulterous marriages and divorces being committed by the Hollywood actors and actresses.  Are not we holy people, separated from the world, to be holy unto our God? What is difference between the holy people i.e. children of the kingdom and the children of the world. How God is going to judge the "sinners in Zion"?  It will be harsher than who are of this world. 

Righteousness demands that we do not divorce and remarry.  The following are some excerpts from the testimony of Cheryl:

In fact, so bad is this situation, that the divorce rate in the church is 4% higher than the nation as a whole – and in the “Bible belt” with the greatest concentration of so-called evangelical churches, the divorce rate is 50% higher than in the nation as a whole!

On Nov. 16, 2004 the Holy Spirit convicted me of being in adultery. Since then I have diligently searched the Scriptures to make sure this is so. When various pastors tried to comfort me, encourage me and pray for me I found no peace until I repented of the adulterous relationship. I believe that the Holy Spirit is trying to open not only my eyes, but the eyes of many remarried adulterers – however, the preachers and pastors just explain away the scriptures. And the convicted souls accept this, finally quenching the conviction of the Spirit. They will then feel a false peace – a “peace” which is not peace, merely the absence of conviction.


So what must we do? We must be like the Bereans in Acts, searching the scriptures ourselves to see whether the pastor or preacher says is so. Our souls must not rest on the opinions of men, but on “what saith the Lord thy God.” “Let God be true, but every man a liar.”

Many denominations have reinterpreted what the Bible says about divorce and remarriage, and now we are reaping the evil fruits of these misinterpretations. The divorce rate among Christians is higher than in the rest of the nation! Everyone is doing what is right in his or her own eyes. Preachers will tell you whatever you want to hear. Most of it is a blend of psychology, popular Bible quotes and American culture and good feelings. That’s basically how our theology on marriage has been reworked in the last 30 to 40 years.


What’s going on? Whatever happened to the authority of scripture? There was once a time in this country where our thoughts on divorce marriage and remarriage was almost unanimous. Even unbelievers knew what the Bible had to say. But today only one out of every 4 or 5 “born again” adults believes that divorce is sin (according to George Barna Research.) This tells us that our pastors are not teaching the truth, they are only feeding the people religious feel-good philosophy to build up the congregations and get the money flowing in.


I have not only searched the scriptures on divorce and remarriage, I have also read church denominational papers and beliefs on this issue, from the Assemblies of God to the Baptists. I have found that most have changed, dramatically, their stance on remarriage from where the church of yesteryear once stood. This has been done to please men rather than God. These church leaders think that just because they have redefined their doctrines to allow for a sinful behavior, God somehow approves! But God had not changed.


These church leaders like to take the passages of Scripture which are somewhat more vague and harder to understand, and use them to explain away the plain teaching of Scripture. This helps them justify our own selfish behaviors. Charles Finney, the great revivalist of the last century, once said that “selfishness is the whole of moral depravity,” and isn’t selfishness the whole of the current acceptance of divorce and remarriage? Why else change everything, other than to allow for the selfish desires and needs of men? This is exactly the opposite of the high calling of every Christian: “If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me.”


Another thing often seen in churches today, is pastors who do preach the truth, but don’t preach the whole truth. They like to skirt around the hard issues found in the Bible. But that doesn’t make those hard issues go away. They are still right there, waiting for the day when pastors again will fear God as much as they fear the opinions of their congregations. On that day we will see a revival like never before. When preachers get that kind of fear of God, we will have a revival that would make John Wesley, Jonathan Edwards, Dwight Moody, Charles Finney and Billy Sunday look on with awe. When I go back and read of Wesley, Edwards, and Finney’s revivals in the past centuries, I see nothing in the church of today that even remotely resembles this. This is not because there are no sinners outside the church needing salvation – it is because of the professing “born again” sinners within the church. It’s because of pastors who do not have the boldness to preach on hard issues, the boldness that can lead to true repentance, as it did in years past.


There are many churches today where the Bible is loved, preached and believed, but we almost always find that the pastors focus on only the positive side of Christianity. They will never preach on hell, they will never preach on specific sins, they will always talk about what Jesus can do for you, how he can help you to be better, how he can help you overcome this and overcome that – as if all these other things, the negative and serious things that are hard to hear are not in the Bible, when in point of fact they are.


We are so deceived. And we want to be deceived, because it is easier to be deceived than to know the truth. And there is no place where we want to be deceived more than in the realm of sexuality. People tell themselves lies until they believe those lies. That is why a pastor of a church of approximately 10,000 in southern California divorced his wife after five years. And one week after the divorce was final, he lined up seven prominent pastors across the front of his congregation to bless his remarriage! When Jack Heyford called him to task for this, he said, “God didn’t call me to marriage. He called me to ministry.” And this sort of thing is going on all over the country.


The core of the problem is that we don’t preach repentance anymore. We just don’t believe in it anymore, because to have repentance you have to hear the hard truth of the Word – the truth that gives God the Holy Spirit something to work with to bring conviction to our hearts. True repentance is what it’s going to take to turn this thing around. Instead of pointing our fingers at others – mostly at homosexuals – we must confess and repent of our own rebellion!

There is some good news. There are some who are standing up to the rot and sin of the church and the deafening silence of the pulpit. Like attorney/pastor Charles Crrismier and his national radio broadcast, Viewpoint, who will speak openly and truthfully about this issue. Like pastors Steven Key, Stephen Wilcox and Joseph Webb who will not stand by and let Satan walk all over God’s precious institution of marriage. And regular ole church folk like me and many others I have corresponded with, who are standing up and no longer willing to be silent. If the pulpit wants to remain silent, let it. God is waking up people in the pews instead. God’s truth will not return to him void. The “rocks” are starting to cry out.


I wish the Lord hadn’t led me to an issue that was so controversial. But we, mankind, have made it controversial so that we may do our own will and not that of the Father. I cannot step away from this issue in fear. As I read about the Roman Empire in its last stages decay, the one thing that was so typical of those last days of decay was the prevalence of divorce, remarriage and homosexuality. The church will address homosexuality with great fervor, but will not touch divorce and remarriage. We seem to be reliving the last days of the Roman Empire .
If we don’t repent of divorce and remarriage, in 20 to 40 years we the church will be facing the same problem with homosexual couples in the church. Pastors who are fearful of preaching a repentance message to the remarried adulterers in their pews, will become just as fearful of preaching repentance to the homosexual couples who will be sitting in those same pews. Just as the church has become accustomed to remarital adultery in the last fifty years, it will become accustomed to homosexuality.


I was one of the many remarried adulteresses sitting in the pew on Sunday mornings. If I had waited for the pulpits to preach repentance and truth on this issue, I would still be in my adultery. But praise the Lord – one Saturday night the Holy Spirit and his Word convicted me. I fell and wept before the Lord and by his grace repented. And praise God, now I see many others around America waking up and repenting also!

Job Anbalagan
December 06, 2007
Sister Cheryl has sent the following message to be posted here.

Job Anbalagan

Old Things are Passed Away

2 Corinthians 5:17 is often used to support the "forgiveness" theory.
"Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are
passed away: and behold, all things are become new." False teachers today
say this verse means that when a person gets saved, all past sins are
forgiven and forgotten. Therefore if one has been married more than once,
God forgives and forgets the other marriage failures and this person begins
with a clean slate in his present marriage.

Such doctrine is blasphemous to the Word of God. First, it totally neglects
repentance. Biblical repentance includes being in godly sorrow for sins
committed, and forsaking sins. Scripture clearly defines this kind of
repentance. "Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his
thoughts: and let him return unto the LORD, and he will have mercy upon
him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon" (Isa. 55:7).
A person who leaves his wife and remarries is living in adultery. The Bible
commands him to forsake his sinful way and his unrighteous thoughts. Then
he comes to God and receives mercy and pardon.

God requires more than just "believing" on the Lord Jesus Christ. He
requires repentance, turning from sin to righteousness. "I tell you, Nay:
but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish" (Luke 13:3).
"Testifying both to the Jews, and also to the Greeks, repentance toward
God, and faith toward our Lord Jesus Christ" (Acts 20:21).

Repentance toward God, and faith toward Jesus Christ is the recipe for
salvation. Men must turn away from their sins as well as place faith in the
shed blood of Jesus Christ in order to be saved. This means that if a
person is in a second marriage (or more) he is living in adultery.
Repentance requires that he abandon his adulterous marriage and seek
reconciliation with his true wife, with whom he is still one flesh until
death.

In neglecting repentance, this "forgiveness" doctrine creates a Pandora's
box of problems. Suppose the altar call is given and sinners respond,
coming forward and praying through to salvation. Then the preacher states,
"Now that you are new creatures in Christ, old things are passed away, and
all things are become new. You are forgiven of all past sins and failures.
You who are in second marriages may continue living together, because God
has forgiven your adultery."

Consider the problems this presents. First, how about the man's first wife.
Perhaps she is in the congregation, along with their children. She has been
caring for them as best she can, and praying for their father to return and
restore their happy home and family. She rejoices to see her husband at the
altar and looks forward to her home and marriage being rebuilt. Instead she
hears the minister approving of the adulterous affair of her husband, and
telling him he is now free to continue in his adulterous marriage, ignoring
his wife and children who are waiting for him to come home!

Carry this doctrine on to its natural and required conclusion concerning
other sins. Two of those at the altar are sodomites, men who have been
living together as though "husband and wife." The preacher tells them "Old
things are passed away. All things are become new. God now recognizes your
relationship as pure and undefiled. God bless you. Go in peace!"

As horrible as this sounds, many churches are now recognizing homosexuals
as Christians, and even ordaining them as ministers. Too bad Lot did not
know about this kind of grace. Instead of God raining fire and brimstone
down on Sodom and Gomorrah, Lot could have made them all Christians,
without them needing to repent!

If an adulterous marriage suddenly becomes sanctified by God because the
parties involved testify to being believers, this must be true of all other
sins as well. There is no reason for the murderer to cease killing, or the
thief to quit stealing. The liar's lies are now made holy, and the
drunkard's drunken condition is now sanctified.

Of course all this is absurd. God's Word is plain. He hates sin, all sin.
Adultery and fornication are no exceptions. "Know ye not that the
unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither
fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of
themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor
revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God" (1 Cor.
6:9,10). And to this is added: "And such were some of you: but ye are
washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord
Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God" (1 Cor. 6:11).

Praise God for the grace which does not leave men in their sins. Yes, once
we were (not "are") sinners, but through the grace of God, we are washed
and sanctified from all sin.

Marriage is honorable when it exists within the framework of Biblical law.
Outside that law, marriage and sexual activity is destructive to the
individual, the family structure, and the eternal salvation of those who
ignore God's commands.

We cannot compromise this doctrine, because God's Word does not compromise
it. Failure to uphold the truth will result in the loss of many souls,
perhaps even close loved ones. God forbid. Let us continue to preach the
truth, for only truth can set men free.
Cindy
December 07, 2007
Tropical,

It is your belief then that Lk. 16:15-18 does not apply to the follower of Christ?   That we ARE entitled to join in adultery with God's blessings upon such unions?   You think it is Satan who convicts of our sins?   If I had an extramarital relationship as a Christian, do you think it would be Satan who convicted me to forsake that relationship............or would it be God?   How about two homosexuals who come to the knowledge of Christ and accept Him as their Lord and Saviour?   Would they be following the "law" and hearing from Satan, if they believed it right to forsake their illicit relationship?

On the other hand, do you think it "law" for those faithful ones who have been forsaken to believe themselves to be joined by God to their spouses for life?   Is it "law" for them to believe someone is committing adultery with their spouse?   Thank you for pondering my questions............Blessings..........
Cindy
December 07, 2007
<<<<<1 Tim 1
realizing the fact that law is not made for a righteous person, but for those who are lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers   10 and immoral men and homosexuals and kidnappers and liars and perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound teaching>>>>

<<<<When He said, "A new covenant," He has made the first obsolete. But whatever is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to disappear>>>>

Hello Tropical guy,

You didn't answer my questions though.   You posted scripture, but even the passage above is dealing with those who are NOT living immorally.  A righteous person cannot live immorally AND in truth walk by the Spirit.

In the case of a spouse who has forsaken their marriage vows and joined themselves to another and their spouse who is praying for the wayward to repent from their adultery and come home to their family..........which is walking by the Spirit and which will be judged by God as being under the "law"?


Cindy
December 07, 2007
You're still not addressing my question, though.  Let me put it another way:   If Joe divorced Mary and then married Sue, and Mary is praying for her husband to come to repentance and return to her and their children...............Do you believe Grace in regards to Joe means that he can stay in what the Lord has called adultery.........and that for Mary it means that she has to stop praying for her husband to come home because God is now honoring the second marriage he entered into?
Job Anbalagan
December 07, 2007
Let me now moderate all these discussions.  I request humbly Tropical Guy to respond to the above poster of Cindy. 

About the matter of Law, I just want to clarify my position.  The words of Jesus Christ for us under the New Covenant are not part of the Law of Moses.  Grace and truth and Law are two distinct foundations. I humbly request Tropical Guy to argue how the words of Jesus Christ are in continuation of the Law of Moses. 
Job Anbalagan
December 08, 2007

"Look at the legalized adultery we call divorce. Men marry one wife after another and are still admitted into good society; and women do likewise. There are thousands of supposedly respectable men in American living with other men's wives, and thousands of supposedly respectable women living with other women's husbands." - R. A. Torrey From R.A. Torrey's book How to Pray, pages 94-95

 

R.A. Torrey (1856-1928) was a very well-known Christian writer, evangelist, pastor, graduate of Yale University, and was also the superintendent of Moody Bible Institute for 19 years.

Cheryl
December 08, 2007

Amen, R.A. Torrey Hit the nail on the head! My, how times have changed. See below.

New York Times
December 7, 1904, Wednesday
TRINITY BARS THE DIVORCED.; No Remarriage in the Church or Any of the Chapels.

The clergy of Trinity Church announced yesterday that under no circumstances will divorced persons be married by any of the clergy of that Episcopal parish, nor will such marriages be permitted either in the church at Wall Street and Broadway or in any one of the parish's eight chapels. The announcement was as follows:
View full article

Cindy
December 08, 2007

Never mind, Tropical Guy.  It is clear to me that you will not answer the simple questions I've asked you.  I don't mean to be difficult, but the type of response you gave me is exactly why we are seeing the divorce/remarriage mess in the confessing church today..........Many pastors do exactly what you have done----avoid answering/addressing those hard situations..........Personally, I believe the Lord DOES want answers given to the wife/husband who is remaining faithful to their spouses/vows  as well as to those who have forsaken their marriages/families.

Cindy
December 08, 2007
Cheryl,

Isn't it ironic that the same church who wouldn't allow their clergy in 1904 to marry divorced persons are now allowing practicing homosexuals in the pulpit.............not only that, but one who divorced his covenant wife and now lives with a man in sin is leading the American Church.

Mainstream evangelical Christians say that homosexuality will be contained within "certain" churches.  I don't believe it.   I believe the Episcopal church's downfall started with sanctioning adultery sometime after that article was written, and it has progressed to what we are now seeing.   The rest of Western Churches are going down the same road.........and they WILL have the same results...........and probably when that happens, there will only be a few voices crying out...........as there are now concerning adultery in the church.   The majority will be saying those who cry out are "legalists" or people that are following "laws".   It is very sad, but Jesus and Paul both warned of these things in the days preceeding His Coming in Glory..............
Job Anbalagan
December 09, 2007
Let us not be prejudiced against any particular denominational church like catholics or protestants or pentecostals.  Let us bother about the truth they practice.  If some churches come forward to uphold the truth concerning divorce and remarriage, we should welcome them. In India, we do not solemnize any such unscriptural marriages at all. 
Cindy
December 09, 2007

Yes, you are right brother Job.  The plague of adultery in the church, as well as homosexuality, is not found only in certain denominations, it is quite widespread now.   I personally do not know of any one entire denomination that teaches the permanency of marriage.   What we find are a smattering of individual churches within denominations that uphold the sanctity of lifelong marriage and the prohibition of practicing homosexuals in the ministry/membership........so we cannot make broadsweeping comments about any particular denomination, nor the people involved in the denominations.  At the Marriages for Life conference I attended in 2006, I was very excited to see that those who believe in the permanency of marriage come from all different denominational backgrounds.   We all had the same concerns/sadness, etc----that what was once considered to be sin was now being passionately embraced within our churches.  Many sit there silently in their churches, not "approving" of what they see, but they do not know what to do.  I was there at one time................yet I know that remaining silent will NOT change anything.  In due time, it will encourage MORE to enter into sinful relationships because most view silence as approval on some level.