|
| The ideal MyChurch blog! |
|
| |
No, this isn’t it. This is just a blog about the ideal blog. Or rather, some of my own ideas on what the ideal blog might look like. Of course, the most important thing about blogging on MyChurch is not to write an intelligent sounding, Biblically accurate, beautifully-formatted blog. The most important thing is to reach out and connect with the community of fellow believers here. There are many different styles of blog writing, and everyone eventually develops their own. Oh yeah, and the other important thing about blogging is to have fun!
So without further adieu, the ideal MyChurch blog: - is well formatted to facilitate easy reading
- utilizes a text size that is neither too large nor too small (see #1)
- does not involve too much scrolling to read it all
- may or may not include an image (visuals are completely optional)
- is more than just a link to a video or audio file (it's also nice to know why it's meaningful)
- represents an original thought or insight
- causes the reader to see God in a new or somewhat different way
- was not written at work!
- is not labored, overwrought, or tedious (don't over-analyze wording, just write)
- credits others for borrowed thoughts or content
- may use humor to make a serious point (although funny but pointless does keep things loose)
- had spelling and grammar checks done prior to posting!
- utilizes the “first person” point of view
- avoids preaching
- is not edited after being posted (no one writes intending to edit later, yet many of us do!)
- doesn’t plead for stars
- may invite feedback
- exalts God
- doesn’t belittle people (made in the image of God after all)
- may or may not include a Bible reference (yes it’s ok to write about your life!)
- is posted to one’s church blog, if applicable
- does not ask for money
- may ask for prayer
- does not embarrass one’s spouse
- is primarily written for an audience of One, but acknowledges the entire community
- has an appropriate and perhaps catchy title
- does not pick any fights or arguments
- shows great compassion for non-Christians
- does not employ long bullet lists
- treats hot button issues (e.g., tongues) with the utmost humility and sensitivity
- doesn’t take itself too seriously
- is personal and honest, though not overly revealing (nothing is "just between friends" on the www)
- disarms readers
- is easy to find
- will attract family, friends, and neighbors to visit MyChurch.org!!!
Anything else overlooked??
|
|
| To add a comment to "The ideal MyChurch blog!" |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| June 18, 2007 |
 |
|
|
| Just wondering, Mike.....how can you exalt God and not preach? lol :) |
|
|
| June 18, 2007 |
 |
|
|
Whats wrong with writing blogs at work? (just joking)
Good list my friend. |
|
|
| June 18, 2007 |
 |
|
|
| I like this, Mike! But I just broke #15, because I added a plug to this blog in my How To Get Around in MyChurch blog! (Let me know if you prefer I delete it!) Really good points here! |
|
|
| June 18, 2007 |
 |
|
|
| Kathy, I'm guity of breaking that one from time to time too!! No problem plugging this, thanks for asking. Feel free to link to any of them, as I trust you'd extend the same freedom to me. That's what community is for! ~mike |
|
|
| June 18, 2007 |
 |
|
|
Mike, I must say that "ideal" is a relative term to say the least. Different people look for different things. And also, not everyone has the gifts to be able to format well, or write well, or even put a thought down in a way that might interest others. Although you did clarify in the first part that this is your opinion. So how about "My Ideal MyChurch Blog?" :)
I do disagree with point #15. I think the "edit" function is there for a reason. And it is useful when you come up with an additional thought, find a mistake etc. I would say the exception would be to edit the post to the point that it differs from the orginal thought.
I also wanted to say that I get very annoyed when I see #24 broken. We should never use this site to bash anyone, especially our husbands and our churches/pastors. Now that's just plain Stompin' On Holy Ground! |
|
|
| June 18, 2007 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| June 18, 2007 |
 |
|
|
| Sue, I break #15 myself frequently (in fact I admitted this to Kathy too, above). But wouldn't the ideal be right the first time? (ok, maybe not always) To an extent I agree that it's relative, which is why I prefixed the list with "just one person's opinion". Although I believe that most people will agree with most of these. We should aim high, shouldn't we? :-) ~mike |
|
|
| June 18, 2007 |
 |
|
|
| I had to somewhat disagree with at least one of your post, I am always agreeing with you :) |
|
|
| June 18, 2007 |
 |
|
|
What about number 29? Do you believe that this list is an example.
j/k |
|
|
| June 18, 2007 |
 |
|
|
J/K- #29 was my attempt to comply with #31
(I guess you hafta get my sense of humor....) |
|
|
| June 18, 2007 |
 |
|
|
i didnt see 31...oh now i do |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
It's interesting. Because the initial idea behind a blog was to be an online web lob aka diary. So that would mean that it would be all about the person writing and their life. The majority of your points show that this has changed to be about what others think. Mike, Can you show an entry that meets this criteria (or most of it), that actually comes close to your ideal? :) |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
Actually thinking about it. The post might read something like this ------------ Title: Often Quoted. If you're looking for brilliance here, stop. Go read your Bible instead. ------------ Although that does defeat driving people here. ;) |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
Good list! I'm going to have to print it off now, and stick by the computer monitor (at home, not work), so that I can make sure I write the ideal blog! Thanks for the suggestions Mike! |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
| Mike, I consider you a good friend,but until I joined Mychurch I didnt even no what a blog was. I found out bloggin is awesome. Ive learned a lot here, from both old and young. Especially the young because they are so honest. Ive seen the core of people here, Ive seen what make them tick. People are more likely to open doors to painful places that they would not other wise not open and to me, If it comes out in the wrong format or not in the right context thats OK. There are alot of cries for help that come in desperate writings. Im glad they are here on Mychurch as I know you are. People express themselves differently and I hope you will take that into consideration. I understand what you are saying and I dont agree but that is only my opinion. God Bless! |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
Thanks for sharing that, Anthony. I especially appreciate the divergent points of view, b/c they really make me stop to consider where I'm at, PLUS one could argue that it takes more courage to post such a point of view than agreement. Anthony, you are a good friend, you just proved it!! ~mike
ps...Norm,. your point is exceptionally well taken too!! |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
I think I may need to break one of my own suggestions in this list (the oft-violated #15) and change "that have broken these rules" to something a little softer, like "goes against these suggested tips". Whaddya think, readers??? A couple of commenters hint that this list is too strict, and that's not the intent. I specifically included the sentence starting "Granted there have been quite a few great blogs" so that readers won't think this is the only way to do it. (Just, in my opinion, the ideal way...)
Ok, let's be honest here. Look at the blog posts that have gotten the most attention from readers. For the most part don't they adhere to the items in this list?? (Again, I know there are some great exceptions.) Do we want new folks to come onto MyChurch, who don't have a clue what a blog is, and to take time to post a few times, then quit b/c they got no reaction from the community? The spirit here is more info is better than none, and after a WHOLE lot of blog reading (and writing too) I chose to share what I see as working vs not. I also love to exhort the exemplary practice of community (w/o having to stand on a stage in front of hundreds of people to do it!!)... Maybe I should have included this above, in the blog itself. Maybe I will. Maybe I will break #15 again! (ok, now I'm starting to wonder why #15 is even there at all -- gee whiz people, you've got me doubting myself!!!) ~always in love, mike
ps... I'm blogging from downtown San Diego this week! (ESRI User Conference, SD convention ctr) |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
| MIke, I understood this list more as "Helpful Considerations for Writing a Blog," not rules that have to be followed, and as such, I think it's great! We all know a blog can be anything from "Hi, I'm new here. The End." to a 100-page dissertation on Eschatology, and that's OK. For those looking for more response from readers, you have provided a good tool (imho)! |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
| Kathy, you are totally in my head, and that is exactly where I was trying to go with this. BTW, is it scary in there? :-) |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
Can #15!!! The edit function is there to use it! And sometimes when we type this things, we don't realize how we come across. Like I said before, I love the way we can put our foot in our mouth and then take it out :)
I also wouldn't want someone who doesn't know anything about blogging, (as I was just 5 months ago) feel that they need to obey this long list of rules. It may intimate them all the more. Your right to make the change. These are suggestive tips, not rules.
Anthony, I am glad to see I am not alone :)
Consumed, Your June 18th comment was hillarious! |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
Did you have any idea of what you would stir up when you wrote your list? I doubt it! Because publishing has been my life-long passion and my profession, experience has given me the confidence to break the rules and go with my instincts. However, I understand that many find blogging intimidating and I commend anyone who speaks up when they have something to share. Good ideas and a desire to be part of the community aren't limited to those who know the mechanics of blogging. I'm sure if you had it to do over again, you would stress the things you said in your June 19 comment. My hope is that people will see your list as advice from a well-meaning friend, not a set of rules they have to conform to in order to blog. Perhaps #31 should be featured more prominantly and reworded to say something like this: "MOST IMPORTANT: Start where you are, try to improve along the way (especially if you want comments), AND don't take yourself - or me or this list - too seriously." Personally and professionally, I think you have given a very thorough list of what constitutes a well-read and well-received blog. I'm going to print it out and refer to it as the "ideal," keeping in mind #31! THANK YOU. |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
Sue, do you mean to tell me I shouldn't feel guilty when I edit my blogs, even after people have commented on them?? This would be great! But still, somehow it just feels icky. Yeah, the edit function is there to be used when needed (and I am glad for it!!!), but ideally the blog would be right the first time. Remember, that's the ideal, not the baseline.
JayKTX, wow you said a mouthful. That's GREAT! That's excellent input, which I will take to heart. Heck, now my resolve to smash #15 is even greater! :-) As for stirring things up, you're right, I had no idea. But hey, it's cool, I guarantee I'm giving a lot more thought to my list than I did when I wrote it ....and anyone who knows me knows my tendency to put thought into everything I do before I do it. The term "analysis paralysis" was invented to describe me! haha ~mike |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
OK, my first thought when I read your list was... Oh my, this is a long list of commandments. lol No, really I understand that you are trying to transfer to us some wisdom in this avenue of communication that involves freedom of speech and the thoughts and opinions of Christian all over the world. I thank you and I gladly receive it. I really sense you are telling me the following:
Hey my dear blogger use common sense and use love above all.
Good advise. Thanks,
Lourdes |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
| Oh no... I wish I could go against your #15 right now. I think I should have said venue instead of avenue. Where is the edit button when you need it??? |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
| I would think it would be perfectly fine to edit a post if there were comments. It would be the stars that I would worry about. People can delete or add to their comments, but not their stars. That is why I made the exception of when you edit to the point of changing the original thought. |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
Oh, and you could also add avoid yellow font! Cause we can't see yellow font!!
Gee, you will be able to plug this one almost anywhere :) |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
| and plug it I shall! hee hee |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
Point #15 seems to be the biggest "hot-button" on this list...makes me think... Are we here to share what the Lord has shared with us, attempting to do our part to edify our brothers and sisters in Christ? or are we here to share whatever random (and perhaps counter-productive) thoughts happen to jump across our minds? What if the original penners of the Scriptures had gone back later and "editted" what came across their minds as "not quite ideal"? If we're seeking to give our brothers and sisters what the Lord has first given to us, wouldn't that be most accurately portrayed the first time? That brings up a follow-up question: if we need to keep changing it, is it even from the Lord in the first place? I know I've been guilty before of putting finger-to-keyboard regarding things that have not been given me by the Lord, but rather have simply been ramblings or whatever, so I'm no different by any means from anyone else here. I know also that the Lord has been gracious even to stop me from time to time and give me something truly from Him (as was the recent case of the "From-To/Re-direction" blog). Shouldn't we be seeking to "be the Church" -- with all that that involves -- instead of just being a "Christian version of _____"? If I come across sharply, I pray you'll be forgiving...I've just been convicted lately about how quickly we're hurtling towards some really tough time, and I know I don't want to face my Lord being guilty of wasting so much precious time writing about how many Oreos I was able to stuff in my mouth yesterday...I want to be able to face Him knowing that though I by no means was perfect in my actions here on Earth, I at least gave my best shot at doing what He wanted me to do in regard to edifying His Body. In His service, and yours, jason |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
Mike,
I think you have a a future in politics. |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
Jason, excellent question, and yes, maybe at the back of my mind when controversial #15 came to me: if we need to keep changing it, is it even from the Lord in the first place? I have written blogs before, then in the process of cleaning up grammar spelling and capitalization, started fiddling with the wording so much that the original thought became unrecognizable. So this has been a problem for me! (a perfectionist) May #15 serve to remind me of just what you did!
Brad, what did I do to deserve that? .............haahaa, just kidding, I know what you meant! |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
I come at blogging from a whole different context. I have been blogging since the mideighties. I use it as a history of my own thoughts, actions, activities, and findings. If you want to comment on it, go ahead. If not, fine. I will keep my blog as my walk with the Lord. I will edit each entry as I see fit to glorify Him which means when I go back and read a psot and fnid taht my dxlyasia has kcicked in, then I will.
I posts things to my blog that reflect who I am and where I am in my walk with God. Sometimes that may be issues in the third world. Sometimes that is issues in my home. Wherever He has me, that is what I post.
Given that, I say, throw the guidelines away, use common sense, be polite and post anything your heart desires. If one of us is offended by it, then we will chat with you. If we think it offends the Body, we will report it. Otherwise, let free speech flow and TGBTG!!
Sorry Mike. Life is filled with too many rules as it is. |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
Hi Voice, As I've said before, I deeply respect you, your posts are always filled with great pearls of wisdom --or interesting news from the Middle East! lol I edited the intro to specifically address a couple of concerns people keep having, chiefly this is not a rigid set of rules. Kathy's sugggestion, "helpful considerations" probably fits best.
I see blogging exactly like you do!! It reflects where I am at a specific time. And this list does just that!! So if you post a blog that abides by zero of these, my feelings would never be hurt, that's just you. But at the same time, I've seen plenty of blogs well received by the community and many others ignored. I believe this list may hold some keys to moving blogs from the latter group to the former.
Thanks for your incisive comments! ~mike |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
I can't speak for everyone else, but I have never "changed" what I feel the Lord has spoken to me, or a message from His Word. I have only changed my grammar and typos :) |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
This started out as one random thought, but evolved into something that should be a bulleted list. There by if it was a post, I would be breaking a rule I'm sure. As it is, it's just a comment, so I'm sure I'm breaking a different rule. (that was supposed to be a light hearted comment, not an argumentative one. :) ) By the way, my original point in the post above was expressed much better by Voice in DC. My personal opinion is to pay attention to why you are writing what you are writing (or posting if it's an image/video/something else). For instance, this post is now linked to from "How to get around MyChurch". Think back to when you were a newbie here. How much longer would it have taken you to get involved if you had read this list? Better yet, would you have gotten involved here if you thought people were expecting these things of you? Sorry if the rest of this seems argumentative and I'm not trying rip anyone apart. I just see a lot of "this is great". My question is "For who"? I still have yet to see an ideal post (meaning it fit all of the criteria (or even half)). If the point is to exalt the Lord, isn't it somewhat odd to also say the point is to drive people here? How does driving people here exalt God? As for whether we should edit, I suggest you write your favorite christian author/artist/minister/etc. and ask whether they ever go back and change anything. There have been many times where I heard what I thought the Spirit said and then realized the wax in my ears (or rocks in my head) got in the way of hearing what I was supposed to. And not correcting typos when you notice them says what? I'm not saying you have to correct typos, but if you want to, do you think the Holy Spirit is going to say no? When typing up the translations of the Bible I'm sure that someone has accidentally made a typo at some point. If they noticed it, would they not go back and correct it? Also before you say do spelling checks, perhaps there should be a spelling check in the tool we're writing with. (Yeah some people get all high tech and use some other editing software. If I fired up something else to write this it would be notepad which doesn't have spell check either. :) ) Alright, I'm done beating that dead horse. I've asked this question multiple times elsewhere, but navigation (without forming a clique) is out of my control. I cannot make my post easy to find. (Yes I know I could do an RSS feed on my profile. I don't see how that makes things easier to find unless I go and visit someone in my clique.) I think I nail #4 and #20 with every post I do. ;) And I do struggle at times with #27. |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
Shouldn't we be seeking to "be the Church" -- with all that that involves -- instead of just being a "Christian version of _____"? In my opinion, one of the things the Church doesn't do well that it should is to admit when they do make a mistake. |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
| lol Norm, that was very funny! |
|
|
| June 19, 2007 |
 |
|
|
Norm, You gave good advice: "pay attention to why you are writing what you are writing." The original reason for this post was to put out there my opinion (yes, I did say opinion) of what the perfect (or ideal) blog on MyChurch would look like. So to stay true to that, I've restored the original wording of my intro. (The only edit: I highlighted "one person's opinion"). This list was not intended nor passed off as a set of guidelines or rules (even though I used the word "rules" in quotes), it was clearly stated that it was one person's opinion.
I have yet to see the perfect post too, although there have been some awfully close! (not written by me, btw)
Nowhere in the list does it say anything about "driving" people anywhere. "Drawing" is closer, but #35 actually uses the term "attract", which I think Joe and Carol would agree with.
I see #15 comes up yet again! Here it is in full: The ideal MyChurch blog is not edited after being posted. Do any of us ever post anything with the intention of editing, fixing, or cleaning it up later? I would hazard a guess: no. Yet I admit to doing so myself, unfortunately with regularity! However the ideal (perfect, preferred) scenario would not find that necessary. Not saying don't do it, but rather ideally you wouldn't have to!
#34 The ideal MyChurch blog is easy to find - again, ideally blogs would be easy to recall at a later time. Is the onus entirely on you, the writer? Not necessarily. Perhaps the MyChurch team could come up with a technical solution, such as an easy to use method of indexing blogs. In the absence of such a solution, the writer could take matters into their own hands. Some of us (Kathy, Sue, myself) have taken a stab at making our blogs easy to find (see our profiles).
Ok, so why did I include #4 and #20? To convey that (in my opinion) neither an image nor bible verse is necessary to cap the perfect blog. Some might think these are necessary. Given this is MyChurch, I could see people assuming bible quotes are obligatory, assuming we all think along the same lines as folks who hear a sermon w/o scripture. Well, I say not necessary in a blog. (I'm sure Voice in DC would agree, given his post above.)
Surprisingly, nobody has come down on me for #11. Again the ideal (perfect) blog probably has a point, something the Lord has given to the writer. However I am not (in any way) saying someone would be wrong to post a funny blog that has no real point to it. I have good memories of such blogs. I will never think of the pancreas the way I used to, thanks to a MyChurch blogger. I counseled some kid not wear glittery sneakers in public, what was the point of that?? Ninja or pirate?? These were pointless but fun, opportunities to interact with the community. Ideal blogs? No. Bad blogs? Again no.
Only problem with this blog is... the opening paragraph could have been clearer as to the point of this post. Hopefully we're getting there though. And I really do hope this blog is helpful to someone. If I thought it did more harm than good, I'd delete the whole thing in a heartbeat. Comments, stars and all. ~mike |
|
|
| June 20, 2007 |
 |
|
|
I went to your profile and checked out your demonstration of #34. Now I have some more work to do, thanks to you!. Oh, that didn't come out quite right - I am glad to know how to keep my best blogs from disappearing. I appreciate knowing how to do that. (I'm demonstrating #31 here.) You have also demonstrated another way to keep a blog out there: write something sure to be controversial. The comments will just keep coming and keep it "fresh." I wonder if this pot will just keep stirring itself? I'm betting yes! |
|
|
| June 20, 2007 |
 |
|
|
| Agreed voice! |
|
|
| June 20, 2007 |
 |
|
|
| JayKTX, way to keep it lighthearted! Excellent demo of #31, hehe! ~mike |
|
|
| June 21, 2007 |
 |
|
|
Gee Mike,
If I can't BLOG at work, what will I do? Go Crazy? I have hours of monitoring systems and being able to BLOG is my only release. I guess I'll just go back to counting floor tiles to stay busy. :0) |
|
|
| June 21, 2007 |
 |
|
|
Do you want to take this outside Mike n Laura? I will go David and Goliath so fast its not even funny. I had a need to talk about Ninja's and pirates. And about the shoes..... Jesus walked a mile in my shoes....both of them. but besides your (obviously) faulty pounding of my blogs...I forgive you....;)
Keepin it Real
|
|
|
| June 21, 2007 |
 |
|
|
I have written a comment to this i can't begin to tell you how many times and deleted everyone I love you my brother in the Lord but a perfect blogger i'm not, interesting i don't think so , i just write when the mood hits me. If people read it it's ok if they don't it's ok. I do love to read the blogs i like the funny ones they are my escape from reality. I liked the purple sleeping bag it not only was fun to read and write into but it was a ministry tool to get help for someone in need that was the coolest thing.So you all keep blogging and i will too but mine will probably break all the rules..Sorry.......Loves ya all................. |
|
|
| June 21, 2007 |
 |
|
|
To go for the whole circular thing (and to hold to the pluggin' thing), I wrote a followup to my comments above. The Ideal MAP |
|
|
| June 21, 2007 |
 |
|
|
Randy, dangerous to assume I know, but I wrote that bullet with the thinking that if one is at work they would likely actually be occupied with doing work. But in a case such as yours, I would expect you to blog! So where are they all? :-) (hehe)
Josh, thank YOU for keepin it real, and keepn it fun. Seriously, everytime I think of you now I picture you flying through the air in your ninja suit thanks to that very odd but funny blog you wrote. (Simon Peter was the ULTIMATE pirate, BTW.)
Rosie (and everyone else), the important thing is not to write the ideal blog, but to connect with this awesome community. I MUST include an edit somewhere above to make that point (and it is half written already, just need to find time to finish it up). Again if I thought this blog was discouraging anyone from writing (i.e. connecting), I WOULD DELETE THE WHOLE DARN THING! The intent of this was to provide some insights (hopefully helpful ones) for folks who might like to hear an opinion of what makes for a great blog. This doesn't describe the only way to do it, and I think roughly 75% or so who read this get that. Still, I need to break my own #15 and make my intent clearer. Thanks for your comment Rosie (and all the other "dissenters"). I love that we can share even when it's difficult and KNOW that we won't be despised for the rest of our lives! |
|
|
| June 21, 2007 |
 |
|
|
Norm, I appreciate the points you make in The Ideal MAP. I'm glad you took the time to write it. If you read the comment I addressed to Rosie immediately above, you will see that I couldn't agree more with you. (NOTE: I wrote the response to Rosie before reading your map blog.) In fact, if you take the time to read the rest of my comments throughout this blog, you will conintue to see a picture of one who couldn't agree more.
I believe those who have been critical of this blog are reading far more into this than is actually there. You don't disagree with what I've said, you disagree with what it is you think I've said. Or maybe you disagree with the implications of providing a numbered list. (And I'll take the blame, I am sure that I could have made myself clearer from the start.) ~mike |
|
|
| June 21, 2007 |
 |
|
|
Mike, We've gone back and forth on this in e-mail, however I hadn't read your last comment here. We've also had a conversation about intent. The thing is, you keep pointing out that you think those who disagree don't understand your intent and that is why we disagree. 3 things 1) I think in e-mail I proved that I understood your intent. 2) There is a time to consider intent, and then there is a time not to. Let me illustrate. Consider the following. Post Title: The ideal grass color. Entire Content: My favorite color of grass is brown. I like it because it shows I didn't waste a lot of time keeping up my yard instead of evangelizing! Even if we take into consideration that the person who wrote it had the intent to express his favorite grass color and why he is proud of it, would you really be surprised to see dissenting opinions in the comments? It's not that we have a problem with the intent. We have a problem with the content/conclusion. 3) Perhaps those of us who have dissenting opinions have been around long enough to have seen these things happen on other boards/blogs/wherever. Invariably, later someone else will point to this blog and say, "I read that here that an expert says you should do x,y & z when writing a blog and you aren't doing them" (whether that was the intent of the blog pointed to or not or whether the person posting it was truly an expert or not). The very fact that we are pointing to this from "How to get around MyChurch" in my mind only validates my argument. We just haven't seen the "you aren't doing this" comments yet. And yet only dissenting opinions are being told they misunderstood the intent. --- And at this point, I've invested enough of my life in this discussion. Time to go get on with the other things in life. I'm sorry if I've in some ways caused sleepless nights for someone (besides myself ;) ) |
|
|
| June 21, 2007 |
 |
|
|
| Mike, I don't think anyone would ever question your intention. From what we know of you, you can do no wrong :) We (at least I was) thinking of the newbie coming along and seeing this list. |
|
|
| June 21, 2007 |
 |
|
|
| That is a dangerous comment, my good good friend. :-) |
|
|
| June 24, 2007 |
 |
|
|
| I fell asleep trying to read all the comments, thus proving #3 to be true. |
|
|
| June 24, 2007 |
 |
|
|
| Back in the days of 300 baud modems (Do they even make anything less than 56K now?), I had a friend who while reading news would take naps between going through items because it took pages that long to load. :) |
|
|
| June 24, 2007 |
 |
|
|
Mike N Laura, Great Blog I wish I would have read it before I ever posted a blog. Lots of good things to condsider in my opinion. Cheers JJ |
|
|
| September 25, 2007 |
 |
|
|
| Thanks for the ideas. I have been blogging on other sights for awhile and didn't know a whole lot of these things. I was just trying to journal, basically, yet expecting to get into neat dialog because of it. Thanks again. |
|
|
| September 25, 2007 |
 |
|
|
| Thanks BlewJay, appreciate your comment! It was nice meeting you today! ~mike |
|
|
| October 03, 2008 |
 |
|
|
| Well thought out post Mike. To take the Mickie out of an old Welsh acquaintance of mine, "Oi think oi loiks it oi do, boyo!" |
|
|
| October 03, 2008 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
| October 03, 2008 |
 |
|
|
check, check, check, check x 35.....I will send you my list soon of the items You over looked ....I have so far about a list of 50.....LOL
Just Playing.....That was Funny....I will have to Print that off and Tape it to the side of my monitor....to remind myself to comply to all 35...hahaha
Nice to have a little fun here. |
|
|
| October 04, 2008 |
 |
|
|
LOL, Michael, you have about 30 more to incorporate into YOUR blogs! (just kidding!!) Funny comment bro. Grant, I thought you've always been using this list as a guide! :-) |
|
|