|
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
| Day 69 |
|
| |
The reading for day 69 was Matthew 5:1-15:39 and already I feel like what I have the time to say will be very inadequate...
Chapter 5 begins the "Sermon on the Mount" and He starts His "sermon" with the "beatitudes" (verses 1-12). Since each one of these could be a blog unto itself, I will give you links to someone who has already tackled this and has done a very good job. Blessed are the poor in spirit. Blessed are those who mourn. Blessed are the gentle. Blessed are those who hunger and thirst. Blessed are the merciful. Blessed are the pure in heart. Blessed are the peacemakers. Blessed are those who have been persecuted. These blogs by Grant are definitely worth the read. I will also defer to him on verses 13-18 of chapter 5. He has done a really good job with these and not very many people have read them, so here's my blog plug. Go read Grant's blog!
In chapter 6 Jesus gives us direction on how we should not behave publicly. We should not be giving to the poor to get recognition and we should not be praying in such a way as to draw attention to ourselves so that other may know how righteous we are. He says to do these things "in secret" and God will reward us! It seems like it would be easy for us to not toot our own horn if we knew we were going to get something out of it, but we love our pride too much. We would rather have earthly recognition/fame than have an eternal reward in heaven. How sad are we? 6:6 But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
Later in chapter six we are told to "Seek first His kingdom..." Why? Because we want our needs met.
6:31 Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed? 6:32 (For after all these things do the Gentiles seek:) for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things. 6:33 But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you. If we are seeking the kingdom of God, He will provide for us. We don't have to worry about anything.
Verses 1-6 of chapter 7 are famous. Every unbeliever out there knows "Do not judge so that you will not be judged" (NASB). This is a problem because the church has just handed this scripture over to them and let them take it. We have lost the meaning of this passage to the pagan world. This passage isn't even talking about unbelievers. He wouldn't need to say this about them. They are already "by nature, children of wrath." This is said for believers. Lets get our scripture back from the world! The point of this is not that we shouldn't point out sin to our brothers, its that we should examine ourselves first. Get it out of your own life and then you will be able to judge clearly. 7:5 Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye. Chapter 7 verses 15 through 23 does not refer to someone who was a Christian, did bad things and therefore was no longer a Christian. It is speaking about false prophets (preachers). A good prophet will produce good fruit and a false prophet will produce bad fruit.
In chapter 9 the Pharisees get on to Jesus and His disciples because they are eating with "tax collectors and sinners." Jesus' response to them is very interesting to me especially since it comes up again in a later chapter.
9:12 But when Jesus heard [that], he said unto them, They that be whole need not a physician, but they that are sick. 9:13 But go ye and learn what [that] meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance. The NASB says "I desire compassion and not sacrifice." Jesus didn't want their false relgion. He wanted them to love their neighbor.
Does anyone else find it interesting that, in chapter 10 verse 1, Jesus gives power to the "twelve" to heal the sick and cast out demons? Who is in the twelve? Judas had this power? What do you make of that?
In chapter 11 Jesus calls John the Baptist "Elijah who was to come" (NASB). In Malachi, the coming of Elijah was associated with judgement. What judgement can John the Baptist be associated with. When was the great and terrible day of the Lord that was to accompany him?
In chapter 12 the Pharisees get on to Jesus and His disciples again. This time it was for "working" on the sabbath. Jesus gives them this response. 12:7 But if ye had known what [this] meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice, ye would not have condemned the guiltless. He gave them the same reply, only this time, He said "if you had known." The first time, He told them to "go learn what this means." They didn't find out. They didn't listen to what He said, so in a way, this is a double rebuke.
In chapter 12 verses 22 through 37 we see what happens when the Pharisees commit the "unpardonable sin." The Pharisees got mad because, as Jesus was casting out demons, the people began to recognize Him as the Messiah. They told the people that Jesus was casting out demons by the prince of demons. Jesus then basically told them they were stupid and said a "house divided against itself will not stand." 12:28 But if I cast out devils by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God is come unto you.
They saw the evidence. Knew that the conclusion they should have reached was the same as the people reached and then proceeded to call the Son of God the devil. They were saying that the power of God that had driven out demons was really the power of Satan at work. This, my friends, was their unforgivable blasphemy.
There are so many things in this passage of scripture. There are so many blogs, sermons, etc. that could come from this. Sadly I cannot cover it all. If there is anything that you wish I had addressed and did not, I will be glad to come back to it...just let me know. I think this will probably be a pattern... |
|
| To leave a comment or start your own blog: |
 |
or |
 |
Already a member? Login |
|
|
 |
|
Sue |
 |
July 25, 2007 at 11:22pm |
|
Is this Bible you share from Reformed? Just curious :) |
|
|
I don't know what you mean *looks around nervously* |
 |
|
Sue |
 |
July 26, 2007 at 10:26pm |
|
| Is it "free will" or "free grace?" |
 |
|
Sue |
 |
July 26, 2007 at 10:27pm |
|
| Or...Is it a Reformed Bible? |
 |
|
Sue |
 |
July 26, 2007 at 10:28pm |
|
| Or....Does it give man the glory or God the glory? :) |
|
|
The Bible is the Bible...if it leads one to a reformed point of view I would say thats Biblical :)
Sola gratia (grace alone) Sola fide (faith alone) Sola Chritos (Christ alone) Sola sciptura (scripture alone) Sola Deo Gloria! (to God alone be the glory!)
If the question is, "Hey Zach, are you reformed?" Then the answer would be a resounding YES!
Thanks Sue! |
 |
|
Sue |
 |
July 26, 2007 at 11:52pm |
|
| Okay, If it is just a Bible, with no study helps, then yes, it is reformed :) If it is a Bible with study helps (and I assumed from your post that it is :), then are the study helps from a reformed prospective? I know you are bro! We already established that! |
|
|
Actually the Bible I'm using for my reading does not have any study helps. The plan is for using the NIV 90 Day Bible...but I am just using the reading plan. The Bible I'm using is a wide margin NASB. Neither of these Bibles use study notes :)
Sorry I misunderstood Sue...please forgive me :( |
|
|
| I do have a John Macartur Study Bible and a Spirit of the Reformation Study Bible, both from a reformed perspective, and they are excellent :) |
 |
|
Sue |
 |
July 27, 2007 at 8:57am |
|
| I use the Reformation Study Bible, which was the Geneva Study Bible. It is the best! This is the one where RC Sproul wrote the commentaries. |
|
|
| very cool...i like sproul :) |
|
|
Zach, I like the descriptions you are writing about your daily readings. Very cool! I myself blogged on Matt 7:3-5 (plank in the eye) a few months ago, though it wasn't written as well as I had hoped ... it's here.
Anyway, thanks for blogging your way through the whole Bible! ~mike |
|
|
| Thanks for reading them :-) Its good sometimes to have affirmation thats not silent! |
|
|
| Ahhh, excellent response! |
 |
|
Eric |
 |
February 06, 2008 at 10:25am |
|
"The Bible is the Bible...if it leads one to a reformed point of view I would say thats Biblical :)"
ZING! LOL!
"Okay, If it is just a Bible, with no study helps, then yes, it is reformed :)"
Another ZING! HAHAHA!! Thanks for the interesting perspective notes, Zach. |
|
|
More Posts from Zach and Jessic...
|
|
|
|
|
|