Um, I think God would have a problem with people thinking God works through things rather than people. The Kings passage is quite strange; didn't notice that when I read through Kings. Not sure what's up with that. The woman in Matthew 9 was cured by the Father through the Son, not through the cloak. It was the woman's faith that cured her, not the cloak. I would argue that the two examples you cited in Acts are identical to the one in Matthew 9. Now, stepping back from the theory a bit, personal possessions are a part of these examples. But it's a slippery slope to shifting from praying for the healing power of the Father in faith, to requiring objects to pray through for healing. Most New Age religions involve "mystical objects." For me personally, the practice is very similar and I express extreme caution over using objects to pray with. Considering they're not required it might be best to avoid them altogether. I'm sure there are many Catholics who understand this, but my caution may simply be myself setting up a false boundary to make sure I do not sin, akin to, say, establishing a personal rule not to be alone with another woman. It's not against God's Law to do so, but it may simply be safer for that individual to establish a personal rule like that. The centurion sent friends to him, saying to him, "...say the word, and let my servant be healed. ... [Jesus] said, "I tell you, I have not found such great faith even in Israel." |