Charlie  Lafferty
Charlie Lafferty's blog
 148stars  |   21readers
View profile|View all posts| Follow this blog
Controversial statement about the devil/satan?
||October 02, 2007|2267 reads
 

To add a comment to "Controversial statement about the devil/satan?"
Jen Rebo
October 02, 2007
Wasn't it Wigglesworth who is said to have woken up one night to find Satan sitting at the end of his bed?  He (Wigglesworth) looked at him (Satan) and said, "Oh, it's you."  Then he rolled over and went back to sleep.
Charlie  Lafferty
October 02, 2007
Yes Jen, what a man of God Smith Wigglesworth was!
Mike n Laura
October 02, 2007
Hehe, I don't know if I could simply roll over and go back to sleep if I saw Satan on my bed. Actually, I might be tempted to be flattered -- like, why's he wasting his time on lil 'ol MY bed when there's Franklin Grahams and Rick Warrens and the like out there, far bigger fish than I!

I'm not sure that God's having control is the same as God's exercising control. Is "making things happen" the same as "allowing things to happen"?

Also, with the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day. So where does one get the idea that we are moving into a new "age of the mature son"?
Charlie  Lafferty
October 02, 2007
That's a great question Mike!  I think allowing and excersing are different, but each reveals God's power and control.  I don't believe for a minute God is condesending to satan's wishes.  If they do not fit into His plan, purpose and design, He will not allow nor exercise His power to make it happen.  In either case, it still reveals God's supremacy (to dominate or defeat).

Well, I would hope God's children are moving toward sonship/heirs and not just "going to heaven" and settling for a "little cabin in glory."  As far as the next age..I'm not so clear.
Mike n Laura
October 02, 2007
Hey Charlie, I'm with ya on this....

"I don't believe for a minute God is condesending to satan's wishes.  If they do not fit into His plan, purpose and design, He will not allow nor exercise His power to make it happen."
Charlie  Lafferty
October 02, 2007
Amen bro..God is suprreme ruler and caller of the shots!  Nuttin passes by His scrutiny, sovereignty or wisdom.  Hallejuah!!
Sue
October 03, 2007

I think the problem is the opposite.  Not that we should give satan "credit."  But I think often times Christians just ignore the fact that the devil does exist.  We need to be prepared and ready for spiritual warfare.  If we just sit back and act like the enemy isn't even there, we are not as protected as we would be if we were armed and ready for battle.  If we can recognize and know his schemes, we can defeat this evil foe in our own lives.

Charlie  Lafferty
October 03, 2007
I hope no one is thinking that I'm saying ignore or deny there is a devil!!  I hang out in lots of different Christian circles and far too often I hear the devil getting blamed for things.  He is not omini-present, all knowing, etc. but it seems he sure gets around a lot.

Why is satan still around?  I think it is cuz he is useful to God to fulfill His purpose.  The goal is draw closer to God in intimate fellership, right?
Jonathan Thomas
October 05, 2007

Just a thought...

If satan was the problem, then why does God require US to grow mature to overcome him (satan)? 

Mike n Laura
October 05, 2007
hey Jonathan, how's everything going?
Charlie  Lafferty
October 05, 2007
Good ol' Jack, the hyjacker ;-).  You just help keep things going Jack.  I love this discussion.  I hope more will join in and share their thoughts. 

Jonathan, you brought up a good question.  I'm not sure just what you were getting at, but here's what came to me.  John (the apostle) wrote about the children, young men and fathers.  To the young men he says (twice) that they HAVE overcome the wicked one.  I know when I was younger, that was my goal :).

Then (twice) he writes to the fathers that they have KNOWN Him who is from the beginning.  That seems to be God's heart..to KNOW Him intimately (eternally) through out our lives (beginning to end, age unto age).  This sums up from being a child, young man/woman, to being a fruitful father.

Maybe someone else can help explain the verses below:
2:12 I write unto you, `my' little children, because your sins are forgiven you for his name's sake. 2:13 I write unto you, fathers, because ye know him who is from the beginning. I write unto you, young men, because ye have overcome the evil one. I have written unto you, little children, because ye know the Father. 2:14 I have written unto you, fathers, because ye know him who is from the beginning. I have written unto you, young men, because ye are strong, and the word of God abideth in you, and ye have overcome the evil one.

Cameron Horn
October 06, 2007
The devil is not a characature or a figment of our imagination. He is very real and active. It is a great mistake to underestimate him or to overestimate him. He is in his place within the authority of God. The apostle warns us several times that we are in a conflict, that we should be sober and vigilant and aware of the fact that we have an enemy who is not "kick back". He is more powerful than we are, but less powerful than the ONE who can raise us up above his attack and schemes.

Some attribute all evil to the corruption and fall of man, but I say that that is aligned with the evil one. Instead of Satan being the great pied piper, instead he pumps up the corruption within men like an old inner tube that is over inflated. He just stands there with a foot pump and off men go to do his bidding, like slaves. If you think you can free yourself from his grip, just try to do it. He doesn't like to let go of his slaves.

I am convinced that the Lord in His wisdom has allowed Satan to exist in order to hone us, purify us and drive us further into Christ, who is our One refuge. As we walk however, and grow, Christ puts those principalities under our feet.

Satan and his principalities hold sway over entire nations, governments and institutions. He is no figment or man in a red suit, but a powerful adversary. He is however, a defeated foe!

Cameron.
Dude
October 06, 2007

without the church there is no body of Christ & we hear the Gospel through the His body. without the body of Christ you cannot hear the Gospel with clarity.  perspicuity of the Gospel presupposes you are imbedded in the body of Christ.

u are right that the pulpit is not infallible, but the man on the pulpit is also part of the body of Christ, the pulpit + the rest of the Body speaks the Voice of Christ.  u alone in a room by yourself with your own dreams/vision and the bible may contain a bit of truth, but it is no more infallible than the man on the pulpit u criticize.  p.s. go back to church. no man is an island.

Dude
October 06, 2007

yes, there is a time for everything and exceptions to every rule. but the point remains, a Christian is a healthy Christian when she is in correct relation to the rest of the Body.  and as beautiful and poetic it may sound to hear stories of devout ones going into the wilderness to hear the voice of God, 99% of the time, you hear what you want to hear and come out like David Koresh. 

 who knows maybe you are the next Moses or Elijah and you all called to do something EXTRAordinary, then kudos for you.  just be forwarned, there a lot of spoiled, immature Christians who know nothing of self-sacrifice, suffering, love, and community posing as some "authentic" mystic with profound revelations critiquing faithful Christians as "Pharisees" having "herd" mentality.  if that isn't you, i apologize.

Dude
October 06, 2007
ok then, keep up the good work comrad! lol
Cameron Horn
October 06, 2007
Daniel

The body of Christ is not found in a building, it is found in the Spirit. It is that great cloud of witnesses that a son of God is both aligned with and is ONE with. There is no such thing as "going to church" there is only fellowship in the Spirit of Christ, one with another. This is church.

I can know "church" out in the country through God's creation, in a car with my wife, or occasionally on a forum. I have seen it in house gatherings too, but rarely in a traditional assembly where the members sit in rows looking to one man to be "church" for them.

The problem there is that the pastor very often takes a higher position than Christ Himself. We are to call no man leader, only ONE is our leader, the Christ. The traditional or orthodox church is set up to elevate certain men and women and subjugate the congregation, and for many who are hurting and in pain, a church pew can be the lonliest place in the world. There is no place in the scriptures for the modern concept of the CEO pastor, not by the most gargantuan leap of logic.

I am thankful to God for calling me out of organized religion many years ago, to teach me to be God's man and not man's man. To live by His life alone and not by a set of dead doctrines. The devil is the author of religion in whatever form or guise it takes and whether it calls itself Christian, Islam, Buddhism or whatever. Religion is divided against itself and cannot, will not, stand. It can also boast of more bloodshed than any other institution, including the blood of the prophets.

Christ did not come here to form a religion.

Cameron.
Jonathan Thomas
October 06, 2007

I know it's easy to get caught up in the details of Christian living, but I think Charlie is really on to something with the devil in mind.

It is true he is a worthy adversary and we must be diligent and informed to overcome him.

However, I am fully pursuaded that most claims made against him are false, because the real culprit is usually our own flesh, not specific attentions from the wicked one.

So I have found that most of my efforts are spent in overcoming my own flesh so that I can become a spiritually mature man that can begin to focus on good deeds and overcoming the wicked one in Christ. 

Charlie  Lafferty
October 08, 2007

This is a wonderful dialogue.  I appreciate everyone’s input thus far, and invite others to chime in.  Just remember this: our Christian life is a journey and it is also a growth process..therefore it is not stagnant.  We are called to no longer live by our life, but God’s eternal, life-giving life within us which supercedes our puny, fickle life.

 

Another analogy for Christ’s body is family.  We all have the same Father and mother (Jerusalem from above) and multitudes of brothers and sisters (most of which we have yet to meet) that vary in age from newborn babes to elderly and divinely seasoned saints.  In such a large family no one would expect everyone to be at the same place in their walk, growth or understanding.

 

There’s so much I would love to comment on, but time forbids (due to our limited “earth suits”).  I will say that the key to realizing the body of Christ with it’s complexity and practical functionality is to realize, as has been mentioned above, that the one true and living church is in Spirit! 

 

I appreciate Jonathan bringing us back to the original topic once more.  I agree that our real adversary is the world, the flesh, the devil.  All of which have been fully dealt with from God’s eternal view through Christ and His obedience with all it’s ramifications when He bowed in Gethsemene saying, “not MY will, but Thine be done.”

Mike n Laura
October 08, 2007
Wow Jack, how can you share a "revelation" that God is the "lake of fire" within us (a thought completely unsupported by scripture, and perhaps never even suggested by a single orthodox, respected theologian in the entirety of church history), and then claim that "99% of the churches today they have the Kingdom of God upside down"??? I'm not offended, just find myself deeply concerned by that type of suggestion.

(Sorry Charlie, seems this comment is off track too, delete if you want. I just had to share my concern.)
Charlie  Lafferty
October 08, 2007
Mike, no prob bro, it is not off track at all.  I want us all to experience and appreciate each member of Christ's body.  My prayer is that the Lord will minister through His body and touch all of us personally with His life, light and love.  If we don't open up to one another, we may miss out on a wonderful opportunity to be "touched."

I have said and written things where a dear saint is used by God to nudge and adjust me.  May the Lord use such opportunities as He sees fit.  AND may we recognize God's right and left hand in that touch of love.

PS - Thank you MyChurch for making this possible by providing this forum.
Jess Stuart
October 08, 2007

After reading the book of Job, I came to this conclusion: Satan is God's watchdog and spiritual workout trainer.

Satan himself has no relevant in the Bible, other than his role.  The word Satan means "Prosecuting Attorney".  He doesn't even have a name we are told about.  Micheal, the Archangel, is important enough to have a name and a title, Satan just has a title.  I know this will come up.  Lucifer is a Latin translation of the phrase "son of the dawn".  It wasn't a name in the original Hebrew.

I like to go fishing (I apparently don't like to catch fish, because I never manage to do so).  I always look over bridges to see if any fish are in the stream.  I've noticed the biggest fish are always in the swifter current.  A trout has to be at least 60% muscle.  Why?  It spends it's entire life swimming against the current.  Without the current, the trout isn't healthy.  Without opposition, my life as a Christian isn't healthy either.  That's what God uses Satan for.

Should we be concerned about Satan?  Sure we should - the Bible says so.  Should we chase after him, rebuking him from our milkshakes?  No, the Bible doesn't say that at all.  James 4:7 says I should "resist the devil, and he will flee from you".  The amplified version states that resisting the devil is "standing firm against him".  That isn't chasing after him, that's standing firm.  The very next verse states I should draw near to God.

 

 

Full context for James 4:7

James 4:1-8
1  WHAT LEADS to strife (discord and feuds) and how do conflicts (quarrels and fightings) originate among you? Do they not arise from your sensual desires that are ever warring in your bodily members?
2  You are jealous and covet [what others have] and your desires go unfulfilled; [so] you become murderers. [To hate is to murder as far as your hearts are concerned.] You burn with envy and anger and are not able to obtain [the gratification, the contentment, and the happiness that you seek], so you fight and war. You do not have, because you do not ask. [I John 3:15.]
3  [Or] you do ask [God for them] and yet fail to receive, because you ask with wrong purpose and evil, selfish motives. Your intention is [when you get what you desire] to spend it in sensual pleasures.
4  You [are like] unfaithful wives [having illicit love affairs with the world and breaking your marriage vow to God]! Do you not know that being the world's friend is being God's enemy? So whoever chooses to be a friend of the world takes his stand as an enemy of God.
5  Or do you suppose that the Scripture is speaking to no purpose that says, The Spirit Whom He has caused to dwell in us yearns over us and He yearns for the Spirit [to be welcome] with a jealous love?
6  But He gives us more and more grace ([a]power of the Holy Spirit, to meet this evil tendency and all others fully). That is why He says, God sets Himself against the proud and haughty, but gives grace [continually] to the lowly (those who are humble enough to receive it).
7  So be subject to God. Resist the devil [stand firm against him], and he will flee from you.
8  Come close to God and He will come close to you. [Recognize that you are] sinners, get your soiled hands clean; [realize that you have been disloyal] wavering individuals with divided interests, and purify your hearts [of your spiritual adultery]

Charlie  Lafferty
October 08, 2007
Jess, I appreciate your comments and fully agree.  It is our sensual/fleshy desires that are the prob.  I love your statement, and analogy of fish swimming upstream.  "Without opposition, my life as a Christian isn't healthy either.  That's what God uses Satan for." I would only ask this, if satan does not have a name, why captitalize it?  The devil isn't capitalized.

I agree, our admonishment is NOT fear, but resist the devil and he will flee.
Jess Stuart
October 08, 2007
I didn't even notice that Charlie.  I guess I capitalize satan out of habit, and because it's capitalized in the NASB.
Kathryn Brogdon
October 17, 2007

Had to delete my last comment to Jack. I made a mistake in it. I should have asked what about what Jesus said to at least one of the seven churches that he who overcomes will not be hurt of the second death. It sounds to me as if you are being hurt by the second death--I mean if that's what it is. I wondered how you understand that.

Also, I'm so far down the list here that I can't remember who said that Satan was only a title and he didn't have a name. He did actually have a name--Lucifer "light bearer". Even if it was only a description, so were all the names of the Bible. Michael just means "Who is like God?" How does that square? Our own names mostly have original meanings just like this.
Mike n Laura
October 18, 2007
Michael is not Christ, see Dan 10:13, 21, 12:1, Jude 1:9.  The Bible never refers to the Lord as the archangel Michael.

Lucifer is not Adam, Adam is Adam. When is Adam ever referred by another name? The name Lucifer appears in Isaiah 14:12 (KJV), "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!"
King of cheese
October 18, 2007
Satan Definitley is NOT the power monger we make him out to be ... trying to streall us all through rock n roll    and Homosexuality.  The book of james declares we are tempted by our own lusts,...So the devil made me do it .. is a copout.
New man aside, we are sinfull creatures with The Glory of God within us waiting to be excersised.

I know some doctrines don tlike to think that after salvation we could be flawed but the proof is in some of the great people who have fallen from Biblical representatives to the iconic preachers in history.

Satan is a useful tool. I agree with that statement. He carried out God's plan willingly ,all the time thinking He was winning. The death meant the resurrection but he couldn't see that coming.

For that reason I dont believe he sees the future and anyone claiming they can is either a con artist or a useful tool of Satan.Whats to say he doesnt try to manipulate the future as told by those claiming power.

We need to think back to the 60's when people were singing "He's got the whole world in His hands"... because God is still on the thrown and nothing gets by him.
Jess Stuart
October 18, 2007
Interesting fact about Satan.  Lucifer isn't a name given in the original language of the Bible.  It was a Latin translation of a Hebrew phrase.  Michael is definately in the original launguage.  The -el suffix means "of the Lord".
Jess Stuart
October 18, 2007
Actually I discovered it looking at a concordance.  I looked up "Lucifer" in a NASB exhaustive concordance.  I couldn't find it, so I started digging.  I think it's really significant that the devil is given titles in the Bible ('satan' is Hebrew for 'prosecuting attorney'), but never given a name.
Kathryn Brogdon
October 18, 2007
I'm still praying about the last few comments. After some thought, I can see how some could consider Michael to be Jesus. I don't know that I do. I have seen something similar in the Urantia Book where their cosmology accounts that Jesus is actually Michael. Whether that's a fair comparison to Jack's ideas, I don't know.

Much of Revelation has been sealed until the time when the Father is ready to reveal it. We "get" bits and pieces of it sometimes. Other times I think we don't "get" it at all. Sometimes it only takes one verse of Revelation to throw the rest of the canon into dispute---for instance, the confusion of "hell" with the "lake of fire". That has brought on all kinds of conflicting ideas since Jesus first mentioned gehenna.

I don't see that we need perfect doctrine on all points as much as we need perfect hearts. Basically, we have what we need to be overcomers in the Gospels. Jesus promised that if we lose our lives for His sake, we shall find it. This is the work of faith--that we believe on Him who is faithful to perfect the work He has begun in us. I could easily forget about the book of Revelation (and maybe the epistles) if need be and feel secure just following the Christ of the gospels. I know He will prove all things in His time.
Mike n Laura
October 18, 2007
Jack, I don't recall challenging you on the Second Death. Lake of Fire? Yes. I would challenge anyone who asserts that the Lake of Fire is within each believer. Gently challenge, I might add.

Ok, about that translation error in the AKVJ. Are you saying that the AKJV mistakenly inserted the name Lucifer where the devil is actually being referred to in Isaiah 14:12? Even if Lucifer isn't the devil's name (half the equation), what makes anyone think the name belongs to Adam instead?

I'm no Bible scholar, but I do read the Word faithfully plus I am willing to learn from what the Holy Spirit has taught others down through the ages, unlike some who would pronounce 99.9% of the Bride of Christ to be in error while they and a mere handful of other folks (in all the world) are the sole possessors of Truth. Isn't that what you've meant by your use of the term "little flock"? Would you reduce the "cloud of witnesses" to a transparent wisp?

If you are going to openly criticize orthodoxy, my friend, please know that people who stake their eternal lives on it (and care deeply about others who are reading what you write even now) are going to question you, or respond in some other way (perhaps in their own blogs -- seen a few already).

Christ's love to you,
~mike
Charlie  Lafferty
October 18, 2007
Good observation Jess and K! The reason I wrote this blog is to cause us to question and stimulate some thought and seeking about what we have been taught, assumed, or can honestly prove in scripture about satan. Jesus was lead (driven) by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted. That sounds important to me, but it doesn't fit the "job description" that most Christians have of the devil. Why did Paul say I deliver this one over to satan? (I Cor.5) Was that in reference to sending him to hell? It appears to me to have some remedial value through some not so pleasant circumstances. Actually the Bible is filled with such examples, but most would rather avoid them and cling to their concepts of the devil. So next time you get sick, your car won't start or you're late to church, don't just slough it off as an attack of the devil. Remember, he can only be one place at a time. How important do you think you are?
Jess Stuart
October 18, 2007

Isaiah 14:12 in different translations.

King James:

"How art thou fallen from heaven,
  O Lucifer, son of the morning!
  how art thou cut down to the ground,
  which didst weaken the nations!

New King James:

"How you are fallen from heaven,
  O Lucifer, son of the morning!
  How you are cut down to the ground,
  You who weakened the nations!

NASB:

"How you have fallen from heaven,
  O star of the morning, son of the dawn!
  You have been cut down to the earth,
  You who have weakened the nations!

Amplified:

"How have you fallen from heaven,
  O [1]light-bringer and daystar, son of the morning!
  How you have been cut down to the ground,
  you who weakened and laid low the nations [O blasphemous, satanic king of Babylon!]

Footnotes (to Amplified version):

   1. Isaiah 14:12 The Hebrew for this expression--"light-bringer" or "shining one"--is translated "Lucifer" in The Latin Vulgate, and is thus translated in the King James Version. But because of the association of that name with Satan, it is not now used in this and other translations. Some students feel that the application of the name Lucifer to Satan, in spite of the long and confident teaching to that effect, is erroneous. The application of the name to Satan has existed since the third century A.D., and is based on the supposition that Luke 10:18 is an explanation of Isa. 14:12, which many authorities believe is not true. "Lucifer," the light-bringer, is the Latin equivalent of the Greek word "Phosphoros," which is used as a title of Christ in II Pet. 1:19 and corresponds to the name "radiant and brilliant Morning Star" in Rev. 22:16, a name Jesus called Himself. This passage here in Isa. 14:13 clearly applies to the king of Babylon.

Jess Stuart
October 18, 2007

Don't forget this commentary, from the Amplified Bible:

This passage here in Isa. 14:13 clearly applies to the king of Babylon.

Jess Stuart
October 18, 2007
Dude, I have to say, you talk so flowerdy I can't tell what you mean half the time.
Charlie  Lafferty
October 18, 2007
Jack, chill du..er, uh ma...good fellow :).  I realize you have good reason to feel the way you do about the words "dude" or "man."  Should you impose that on others who have not walked in your shoes?

I personally feel honored when someone younger calls me dude or man.  It's better than "old man." <wink>

Oh, and btw sir, I am your elder brother and I too have a hard time with your flowerdly talk sometimes.  I mean you no disrespect sir.  I enjoy your input Jack.
Jess Stuart
October 18, 2007
I didn't mean any disrespect.  In fact, where I live, it's a term of endearment.
Jess Stuart
October 18, 2007

Are you saying I raked your soul over the coals?

Here's where I'm coming from.  I'm just kind of frustrated with the situation: I want to understand what is posted.   If a post is stated with too many metaphores, or if it includes many colorful phrases (meaning nothing but good), I get lost.

Don Swanger
October 18, 2007
The Jesus/Michael connection is hardly "new revelation" or "restored truth".  It originated in the Arian heresy of the fourth century, and was adopted by the Jehovah's Witnesses and early adventist followers of Ellen G. White as a key tenet in their argument that Jesus is not the fully divine second person of the Trinity but rather a created being.
Please see http://www.afcministry.com/Jehovahs_Witnesses_Is_Jesus_Michael.htm and http://www.exadventist.com/Home/Articles/JesusisNotMichael/tabid/482/Default.aspx

The Adam/Lucifer notion was most recently articulated by a writer named Elwin R.Roach of Alamagordo, NM.  His PATHFINDER website offers a wealth of unique biblical interpretation, particularly as regards the symbolic and prophetic literature.   His Adam/Lucifer article and a concise repudiation can be found at http://www.exchangedlife.com/QandA/is_adam_lucifer.shtml.
The only possible logic I can think of for wanting to show Adam and Lucifer as one and the same would be as an underpinning support for a teaching of universal salvation, and ultimately a cosmic reconciliation between good and evil, Lucifer and Christ.  This is the age-old occult doctrine of "squaring the circle".
Jess Stuart
October 18, 2007
It sounds like you are saying if I don't get everything from your writting style, I'm immature in Christ.  I don't buy that.  If I communicate in a way that someone doesn't relate to, then I'm just not using their language.  That isn't a comment on their maturity or mine.
Kathryn Brogdon
October 18, 2007

Just my feeling here, but when I see reams and reams of teachings churned out by one man, I start to wonder...

Generally,  God gives revelation only in certain areas to individuals. I've taken a look before at the writings of J. Preston Eby and have had this sense. It's not that the teachings couldn't have a ring of truth, but they seemed filled with so much crypto-doctrine, almost like the Kabbalah teachings. There is no simplicity of the faith. After dissecting the scriptures to death so that nothing means what it looks like it means, you start to wonder what your own mother really means when she says, "Good morning." The only logical conclusion to the conflicting ideas of crypto-thought is that there is no order left in the universe, no God and no truth. (Not saying I hold to that.)

There is a book with seven seals in Revelation that no one can open except the Lamb. Each seal when opened gives only a certain amount of revelation and no more. The Lamb opens each seal when it is time to open it and not until. When He opens it, He opens it for a time and for a people He has prepared for that day.

It's really nice that people study the scriptures and all that. It's even good that we have a nice exchange, though we might not all agree. Is the point of sharing to reach a consensus or to come to a truth? And do we get completely wrapped up in peripheral truths to the exclusion of the One Thing Needful, which is Christ Jesus Himself? After so many reasonings, I find that I have to lay down my own mind and imagination in order to find my spiritual center again. Practically speaking, I just need the fellowship of Jesus more than I need to know all of His secret mysteries.

I sure do know about going "outside the camp" into seclusion because I've done it myself. Sometimes you just can't get fed in the organizations. But again, if we are really to be the next Moses or Elijah, as Dude said it, the same kind of supernatural credentials should express themselves in our lives as the authority of God behind it. People do, indeed, come out messed up by being too alone with their own minds and imaginations. But if the spirit drives them there, then who am I to say? I only know my own heart and scarcely that.

The simplest doctrine in the universe: Jesus loves me. That is essentially what this walk is all about. We can't love enough until we really know His love. We can't be faithful until we know His faithfulness. Our whole lives are nothing more than object lessons until we finally "get" all this. How can we worry overly about what we've never seen when we scarcely understand what we already know? God is love, my friends. The rest is gravy.

Kathryn Brogdon
October 19, 2007

Jack, I'm certainly not going to criticize where you are at right now. I have also read some of Elaine Cooke's writings and some I like and some I'm not that sure of. Honestly, though---there are some saints who have seen some of the same things for centuries and others who have seen other, opposite things for centuries.

Is it that the Holy Spirit doesn't lead them? Sometimes not. Sometimes they get different things at different times. And other times I feel quite certain that with many truths that rest on a fine line, we are simply apt to slide off more visibly too far to the issue on this side or that.  

 In the end I have to ask, what has God really revealed to me? See, I have been aware of the manifest sons doctrine and the Revelation 12 saints a good long time now. I'm quite aware of the remnant principle. I just don't see everything identically to all the other saints who hold to a remnant identification. I left a group that was heavy into that.

In the end, I searched my heart to see where God was really leading me. And in my quiet way, I said nothing and did according to my conscience. Even if I am destined to be a doormat in the house of the Lord, better to be in the place of His choosing than to reach for something He didn't fit me for.

And they shall be mine, saith the LORD of hosts, in that day when I make up my jewels; and I will spare them, as a man spareth his own son that serveth him. (Mal. 3:17)

I trust God to make up His jewels--the precious stones in the walls of the New Jerusalem, whether I pass someone else's idea of what it means to be an overcomer, a member of the remnant, etc. To have this peace is very good news indeed.

 

 

Kathryn Brogdon
October 19, 2007
Yes, it is all good.
Charlie  Lafferty
October 19, 2007
Yup, God is good -- and it's all about His life and love.  It's fun to explore the "mysteries" but the bottom line is God IS love and as our Father, He desires an intimate personal relationship with each of His kids.  It's a family thang.

Some grow up to be doctors, lawyers, laborers, etc. and some even grow up to be detectives :).
Kathryn Brogdon
October 19, 2007

Some of them even grow up to be humble little people who, knowing nothing and being poor, make many rich. :) 

Mike n Laura
October 19, 2007
Kat, I love your comments. Well said, all of them.