Kat
Kat's blog
Stars:1|Readers:2|RSS feed|View all entries
||November 01, 2007 at 11:10pm|email it|454 reads
 

To leave a comment or start your own blog: or Already a member? Login

Kat
November 04, 2007 at 3:03pm

There have been a few reads, but no answers. I ran this by a scientist/logician. We agreed that the first part of the argument holds up, but the second part does not. While the first part correctly cannot be based upon a duality, the second part certainly does involve a duality.

Good and evil are true opposites, unlike heat and cold, light and darkness.  The reason for this is that Lucifer was created "good" along with the rest of the Creation. It is only later that iniquity was found to be in him (wherever and however it came to be). He rebelled against God, which is not to say that he lost his original created qualities, but that he chose to be opposite of whatever God wanted. He tried to replace God.

I believe it was in the God Journey where someone reminded us that Satan is not God's nemesis. That is quite true, but in fact, he is mankind's nemesis. God created mankind to rule over all the works of His hands, which included Lucifer. This is why he launched his attack at human beings instead of directly at God. 

So, as I suspected originally, this argument is flawed (not that apologetics and arguments are going to convert people).

More Posts from Kat
Most Popular Posts
 It's the Law---Really?
Please visit my regular blog...
British Director Tackles Abo...
Next Posts
 A book that is as good as Th...
Previous Posts
 It's the Law---Really?
British Director Tackles Abo...
Please visit my regular blog...

 
About | Sitemap | Tools | Advertising | Press | Private Networks | Ministries | Help | Terms & Privacy